vendredi 29 octobre 2010

Bilan de la FED

Petite mise à jour du bilan de la FED.

Au passage, vous pourrez vous faire une idée sur où le quantitative easing va l'emmener (alors qu'on parle de 500 à 1500 milliard de plus au bilan) :

Federal Reserve Balance Sheet Update: Week Of October 27: A Look At Fed Asset Durations
ZeroHedge, 29/10/2010 (traduire en Français texte en anglais )
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/federal-reserve-balance-sheet-update-week-october-27-look-fed-asset-durations


Enfin, sur ce graphique, on a la maturité des titres au bilan de la FED. On voit que la FED qui a racheté tout le marché hypothécaire s'est littéralement défoncé son bilan avec ça... Et en revanche, ses obligations du trésor à son bilan sont de maturité de plus en plus courtes alors que le Ponzi s'emballe...
And a quick look at a topic that will soon be all the rage, the second the media picks it up: the maturity distribution of the Fed's holdings. Look for this unimodal distribution to shift ever more to the left, as the Fed is forced to buy increasingly greater billions of shorter duration, thus locking itself in an endless series of QE refinancing QEs, as Bruce Krasting point out earlier.

Quand on est con...

Petit sondage chez les lobotomisés US :

The Tea Party - Again - On MSNBC And Elsewhere
The Market Ticker, Karl Denninger, 29/10/2010 (traduire en Français texte en anglais )
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=2236233
what's "most important" ?


Who's responsible for the economic meltdown ?


Et beh... On n'est pas sortis du sable... Tout ça, c'est la faute à Obama    Ce pauvre Obama, s'il y a bien un truc de clair, c'est que c'est pas sa faute. Il ne dirige absolument rien. C'est juste un acteur...

Après tout, ceci explique cela. Le peuple a les dirigeants qu'il mérite...

La FED demande à ses petits protégés combien ils veulent de fausse monnaie

Ce pays est devenu une farce...   

Fed Asks Dealers to Estimate Size, Impact of Debt Purchases
Bloomberg, 29/10/2010 (traduire en Français texte en anglais )
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-28/fed-asks-dealers-to-estimate-size-impact-of-debt-purchases.html
The Federal Reserve asked bond dealers and investors for projections of central bank asset purchases over the next six months, along with the likely effect on yields, as it seeks to gauge the possible impact of new efforts to spur growth.

“If they buy too much, I think there’s a real chance that rates are going to rise because people are worried about inflation,” said Stephen Stanley, chief economist at Pierpont Securities LLC in Stamford, Connecticut. “If they don’t buy much, they’re not going to have a market impact.”

Cocher la formule souhaitée :
Another question asked dealers to estimate changes in nominal and real 10-year Treasury yields “if the purchases were announced and completed over a six-month period.” The amounts dealers chose from were zero, $250 billion, $500 billion and $1 trillion.


Sinon, pour ceux qui n'ont pas froid aux yeux, voici la solution très déflationniste à la Denninger pour nettoyer les écuries d'Augias... Pas celle de la FED dont le seul souci est de s'assurer que ses petits amis banquiers fassent des "profits" goinfresques...

Il propose un bank holiday comme Roosevelt l'avait fait en son temps pour nettoyer les banques, fermer celles en faillite, rincer les actionnaires et renégocier les créances des détenteurs d'obligations.

Naturellement, ça n'a aucune chance d'arriver vu que dans le processus, la kleptocratie se fait instantanément virer et/ou rincer...

Let's Talk About A Bank Holiday
The Market Ticker, Karl Denninger, 29/10/2010 (traduire en Français texte en anglais )
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=2237146
Karl Denninger

Let us pre-suppose that Obama grows a sack this afternoon and today after the market closes announces it.

What does it mean?

A few things happen:

  1. All banks are closed as of the close of business and will not re-open unless they're certified clean and solvent.  No mergers, no take-unders, you either live or die.

  2. ATMs, Checks and ordinary "course of business" payment streams are honored.  Account transfers and anything that looks like one is refused.  The point here is to prevent runs on solvent institutions, which would otherwise result.  Since nobody knows at this point who's solvent or not, you lock the system for other than ordinary course-of-business actions.  The Fed does what it is supposed to do - intermediation of the payment systemThere is already a contingency plan and process for this - they know how to do it, and both can and will - they just need to be ordered to do so by the Administration.

  3. Bank examiners swarm into the banks, starting with the big ones.  The 10 largest ones are all examined over the weekend.  MBS and other instruments, including HELOCs, are all marked to the market at today's prices.

  4. The CDS related to these institutions are frozen.  All CDS holders are brought "into the room" and ordered to net out their exposure and post cash margin against any underwater positions.  Those who refuse or are unable have their CDS declared void as fraudulent in the inducement, as there was never an intent or ability to perform.  Yes, this is an abrogation of contract in theory, but in fact you can't contract to do an impossible thing (e.g. I can't contract with you to jump over the Empire State Building, since I can't perform.)  Let the aggrieved parties litigate it out over time - for now, the beast's fangs have been pulled, and suing a bankrupt entity (in the case of a "resolved" bank) is a waste of time anyway - there's nothing to get.

  5. All banks that are insolvent are immediately resolved.  For those that are large national institutions the deposit-bearing parts are broken off into one for each Federal Reserve region.  The securities and other business units are left naked; if they die, they die.  Bondholders are crammed down into equity as required to fill the holes in the balance sheet; the common equity is wiped out.  If - and only if - that is insufficient the FDIC steps in and makes the depositors whole.  Any insolvent bank has its officers and directors ejected and barred for life from any national bank-privileged institution.  The forensic auditors will stay on for months, examining for control frauds and referring all they find to prosecutors.

  6. The solvent banks (and resolved banks) re-open over the space of the next two weeks, starting with the largest institutions.

Now what happens to everyone and their positions?

  • Common stockholders in resolved institutions are wiped out.  They get nothing.

  • Bondholders become either stockholders or are, potentially, protected, depending on their seniority and position.  JP Morgan ($812b), Citibank ($664b), Bank of America ($890b), Wells ($213b) and Goldman ($393b) have approximately $3 trillion in bondholder equity between them.  To this limit within each firm there are no FDIC losses to be incurred.  Goldman, as a non-retail bank, has no deposits to protect at all.  It is my belief that of the "Big 5" all of them can be resolved through this process without any FDIC loss. 

  • The MBS holders who bought fraudulent securities are made whole.  These are pension funds and other investors - literally almost every American who has some sort of retirement fund. These same institutions wind up as equity holders in the big banks if they held bank debt - so while they will take cash losses in the debt, they will offset that with par recoveries on the MBS, and they will have a stake in the resolved institutions and be the ones who have control and profit from their operations on a forward basis.

  • There is no "collapse" of the banking system, the payments system, or the economy.  What there is, however, is a clearing of huge amounts of derivative exposure that has never been able to be covered, all of the fraudulent MBS, and a huge amount of bogus debt that is being held on and off bank balance sheets.  Wells $1+ trillion in off-balance-sheet exposure, for example, is marked to the market and the bogus part of it, whatever it is, disappears.

  • The "moral hazard", "too big to fail" and "too big to jail" rubric and BS games are over.  By referring all control frauds to prosecutors, we put a stop to the games and provide ample evidence that they will remain unprofitable into the future.

  • Lending costs drop dramatically and the economy clears.  Right now there is a huge imputed "tax" on all transactions through the financial system that in many cases exceeds the actual interest cost!  In addition dollar debasement from all the "QE" nonsense has gone into commodity price ramps and will shortly show up on the store shelves.  This money is being funneled to these insolvent institutions to keep them afloat behind your back.  We are talking about hundreds of billions of dollars a year that immediately becomes available in the economy in general.  To put this in perspective this is likely around 2% of GDP that would show up in the economy immediately.  That's a huge increase, given the just-reported numbers - a near-doubling!  This would be offset by all the newly-unemployed Wall Street Bankers who would no longer have their $500,000 salaries that they're siphoning off from the rest of the economy, so it's not all going to go to the bottom line.  But to the extent that any of this goes into capital formation (and plenty of it would, including, I suspect, some new Wall Street institutions) the net impact would be insanely positive for the nation as a whole.

  • Unemployment would initially spike higher, but as replacement institutions sprung up it would quickly be absorbed into the new, lower-cost environment.  Again, while the short-term impact would look very bad, it wouldn't stay that way for long - months at worst.

In confluence with this The Federal Government should announce an expedited consumer bankruptcy authority.  Since the banks now have their assets marked to the actual value, there is no harm to be had to the banks by doing this.  There is, however, the ability to transfer assets to those who can afford them (at the current market price) and free consumers to actually discretionary income again, which is necessary for true recovery.  Let everyone have one bite at this apple - you can go in, you lose the assets, you also lose the debt.

We need to do this, and do it now.  What we cannot afford is an economic incident of some sort that winds up creating another crisis situation that happens in an uncontrolled fashion.

It's time to do the right thing Mr. President.


Ha c'est sûr que ça a une autre tronche quand même...

Le taux de change dollar/yen atteint un plus bas historique

USD/JPY pour les intimes   

Dollar-Yen Closes At All Time Low
ZeroHedge, 29/10/2010 (traduire en Français texte en anglais )
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/dollar-yen-closes-all-time-low

Le Vietnam ordonne aux banques d'arrêter de jouer avec l'or que leurs clients en ont dépot chez elles

Haaa les "non allocated" accounts...

Vietnam orders banks to stop acting like LBMA members
Reuters, 29/10/2010 (traduire en Français texte en anglais )
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSHAN46777220101029
Vietnam's central bank has stopped banks selling gold deposited by customers and using the funds for loans or for converting into foreign currencies, partly to help take downward pressure off the dong VND=.

It is also concerned that, if the value of gold continues to soar, banks could suffer heavy losses when they have to buy gold back to repay depositors.

PIB US à 2%. Rosenberg et Goldman Sachs voient la hausse des stocks comme un signe annonciateur d'un double dip au 4ème trimestre

La croissance US au 3ème trimestre est sortie à 2% (annualisé) en première estimation.

Mais la part de la reconstitution des stocks dans cette croissance est très importante.

Rosenberg rejoint les analystes de Goldman Sachs qui expliquent que quand les stocks vont rediminuer, la croissance va surement repasser négative et les USA en récession. Et ça pourrait bien être dès les 4ème trimestre.

GDP = 2%
Calculated Risk via The Big Picture, 29/10/2010 (traduire en Français texte en anglais )
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/10/gdp-2/


Rosenberg Agrees With Goldman: Sees Inventory Surge As Precursor To Negative Q4 GDP Print, "Double Dip Delayed, Not Derailed"
ZeroHedge, 29/10/2010 (traduire en Français texte en anglais )
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/rosenberg-agrees-goldman-sees-inventory-surge-precursor-negative-q4-gdp-print-recovery-delay
Earlier we pointed out that Goldman anticipated that a surge in the inventory number (which it did, coming at $115.5 billion compared to Goldman expectations of sub-$100 billion ), would simply lead to even more Cash 4 Clunker like forward performance "pull", resulting in a collapse in the quarter in which inventory clearances finally took place. It seems the quarter in question is the current one.

Here is the bottom line: the double-dip has been delayed but not derailed; despite widespread cries from the economic elite to the opposite. The economic recovery is extremely fragile and unless we get an improvement in real final sales, all it would take would be a modest inventory drawdown to pull real GDP back into contraction mode.

Ca s'agite du côté des militaires

Je ne sais pas si c'est un signal faible ou bien si c'est la routine, mais c'est pas trop le genre de news qui me plaisent   

Je ne sais plus qui disait que l'Asie ressemblait pas mal à l'Europe du début du 20ème, en terme de tensions et d'animosité... Et ils se découvrent pour beaucoup en plus, comme l'Allemagne du début du 20ème, une puissance qu'ils n'ont jamaie eue...

Le Japon lance son premier navire du futur destroyer
Le quotidien du peuple, 14/10/2010 (en Français texte en français )
http://french.peopledaily.com.cn/International/7166404.html
Le premier navire du destroyer "Akizuki", un futur destroyer de la Force navale d'autodéfense japonaise (JMSDF), a été lancé mercredi au chantier naval de Nagasaki appartenant à Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, selon les médias locaux.

La construction de trois autres navires du même type est envisagée d'ici 2014. Ces navires déplacent environ 5.000 tonnes d'eau et sont capables de transporter un total de 200 personnes.


Le Japon augmentera de 6 unités sa flotte sous-marine
Le quotidien du peuple, 22/10/2010 (en Français texte en français )
http://french.peopledaily.com.cn/International/7174370.html
Le ministère japonais de la Défense a décidé d'élargir de 16 à 22 unités la flotte de sous-marins de la Force d'auto-défense maritime, a rapporté jeudi l'agence Kyodo News.


North and South Korea exchange fire across the border
The Daily Telegraph, 29/10/2010 (en Français texte en français )
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/8096983/North-and-South-Korea-exchange-fire-across-the-border.html
North and South Korea troops have exchanged fire at the tense border between the two neighbours, an official said on Friday.


Sinon, l'armée US se prépare au Peak Oil :
US navy completes successful test on boat powered by algae
The Guardian, 27/10/2010 (en Français texte en français )
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/oct/27/us-navy-biofuel-gunboat
But the 49ft gunboat had algae-based fuel in the tank in a test hailed by the navy yesterday as a milestone in its creation of a new, energy-saving strike force.

The experimental boat, intended for use in rivers and marshes and eventually destined for oil installations in the Middle East, operated on a 50/50 mix of algae-based fuel and diesel. "It ran just fine," said Rear Admiral Philip Cullom, who directs the navy's sustainability division.


Surging price of oil forces US military to seek alternative energy sources
The Guardian, 28/10/2010 (traduire en Français texte en anglais )
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/cif-green/2010/oct/28/oil-us-military-biofuels
Fiscal reality is dawning as US jets and warships trial alternative fuels in bid to end military's costly dependence on oil

It's a secret just how much oil the US military uses, but estimates range from around 400,000 barrels a day in peacetime – almost as much as Greece – to 800,000 barrels a day at the height of the Iraq war.This puts a single nation's armed forces near Australia as an oil consumer and among the top 25 countries in the world today.

Either way it is by far the world's largest single buyer of oil and the last thing any admiral, general or under secretary of defence has had to be been concerned about is whether there's gas in the tanks or that the navy's carbon emissions are a bit extravagant.

But there are signs of change. Every $10 rise in the price of oil costs the gas-guzzling US air force around an extra $600m each year.

"Peak oil", said the generals, would impact massively on the US and other economies, and the US military would be compromised.

Coal-based synthetic fuels, and biofuels – from both algae and crops such as corn – are now strong contenders to replace the fuels that the military uses to power its tanks and jet engines, says the Department of defence.

Pétrole : c'est la course aux réserves bidons

Décidément, l'OPEP, ils ne finiront jamais de nous faire rire...

Surement à cause de leurs histoires de quotas internes...

Concours virtuel : après l’Irak et l’Iran, le Koweit réévalue à la hausse ses réserves pétrolières
AFP via ContreInfo, 29/10/2010 (traduire en Français texte en anglais )
http://contreinfo.info/breve.php3?id_breve=10119
Kuwait has added at least 12 billion barrels of crude oil to its reserves, which are estimated at over 100 billion barrels, following a comprehensive study, a newspaper reported on Thursday.

the credibility of which has been questioned in the past

On October 4, neighbouring Iraq announced a sharp rise of its crude reserves from 115 billion barrels to 143.1 billion barrels, overtaking Iran, OPEC’s third largest member, in terms of reserves.

But a week later, Tehran also boosted its crude reserves, citing new discoveries, to 150.3 billion barrels from 138 billion barrels, reclaiming third place.

La BoJ aussi se lance dans le POMO et la propagande par le cours de bourse

Dans une tentative désespérée de faire monter les prix de son papier gras et de faire baisser le yen...

Japan Decision To Allow BOJ To Monetize ETFs, REITs And BBB-Rated Bonds Sends Yen Higher, Gold Spikes
ZeroHedge, 28/10/2010 (traduire en Français texte en anglais )
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/japan-decision-allow-boj-monetize-etfs-reits-and-bbb-rated-bonds-sends-yen-higher-gold-spike
Earlier, the Japanese government approved the BOJ decision to monetize, in addition to the traditional JGB securities, also ETFs, REITs, and BBB and higher-rated bonds. In other words, the BOJ is now permitted to do what the Fed will have authority to do with a few months: buy virtually all risk assets, as buying ETFs is the same as buying the general market courtesy of the most traded security in the world, SPY, to push and pull the entire market in whatever direction it goes.


La croissance au Japon risque d'être bien moins forte que prévu
La Tribune, 28/10/2010 (en Français texte en français )
http://www.latribune.fr/actualites/economie/international/20101028trib000567407/la-croissance-au-japon-risque-d-etre-bien-moins-forte-que-prevu.html
La Banque du Japon a annoncé, ce jeudi, avoir revu à la baisse ses prévisions de croissance et maintenu son taux directeur entre 0% et 0,1% et précisé son programme de rachat d'actifs de 13,3 milliards d'euros. De son côté, le ministère nippon de l'Economie fait état d'un net ralentissement de la hausse des ventes de détail sur un an.


L'occident essaie par tous les moyens d'échapper à la purge et à la déflation...

La déflation qui vient
L'expansion via Minuit moins une, Hervé Juvin, 28/10/2010 (en Français texte en français )
http://minuit-1.blogspot.com/2010/10/la-deflation-qui-vient.html
Nous entrons en terre inconnue. Tout ce qui avait été tenu pour vrai au cours des trente dernières années est balayé. Qui se souvient des critères de Maastricht, quand l'Irlande affiche 32 % de déficit annuel ? Terre inconnue aussi, quand le fait que l'Allemagne, la France ou les Pays-Bas empruntent à dix ans sur les marchés autour de 2 % n'attire que des ronchonnements moroses, et non l'enthousiasme d'investisseurs rassurés par la capacité de ces États à tenir leurs engagements.

Car, si l'inflation repart, l'inévitable hausse des taux d'intérêt entraînera de brutales dépréciations de ces matelas d'obligations d'État sur lesquels les épargnants somnolent.

Nul n'ose s'opposer à la logique du moins-disant, qui donne aux acteurs asiatiques une étonnante capacité à détruire nos économies.

Faut-il donc annoncer le krach obligataire ? Ou bien considérer que les prophètes de l'inflation qui vient ont tort, à court et moyen terme au moins, et que les taux durablement bas n'expriment rien d'autre que le doute sur l'avenir ? Nul ne peut ou ne veut, sans frémir, prononcer le mot de déflation. Et pourtant, c'est bien la tendance structurelle d'une économie emportée par la seconde mondialisation. Une globalisation dans laquelle nul n'ose s'opposer à la logique du moins-disant, qui donne aux acteurs asiatiques une étonnante capacité à agir et à détruire nos économies d'abord, nos sociétés ensuite ! L'équation macroéconomique et géopolitique mondiale fait de la déflation la situation la plus probable pour les années à venir. Et la plus détestable.

Pour ma part, je continue de croire sérieusement que c'est ridicule de lutter contre la gravité et qu'on ne fait que s'enfoncer à faire ça. L'occident a besoin d'économistes qui soient des penseurs de la déflation, capables d'accompagner un désendettement de tous les secteurs, en évitant le défaut de paiement massif, en monétisant à la marge au besoin, et en réajustant nos modèles économiques et sociaux pour les rendre robustes à la variation de la monnaie, les pensant à l'équilibre par construction, et non avec des seuils et des valeurs en dur, mais tout en relatif, un peu comme ma proposition de changement du salaire minimum...

Le tout couplé avec des réformes profondes visant à améliorer très fortement la productivité de l'État et de nos structures d'organisation, un déplacement de l'imposition du travail vers la consommation pour régler les global imbalancies, une certaine dose de contrôle des capitaux pour obliger les riches à payer l'impôt, un matraquage de l'immobilier pour crever la bulle et donner ainsi des marges à la baisse des salaires...